Dragon Age: Origins Was Never Meant to Spawn a Series, Says Former BioWare Dev

Popular Now

PUBG Mobile PUBG Mobile Free Fire Max Free Fire Max Genshin Impact Genshin Impact Free Fire Free Fire Counter-Strike 2 Counter-Strike 2 Sonic the Hedgehog™ Classic Sonic the Hedgehog™ Classic Geometry Dash Geometry Dash Gacha Club Gacha Club Fortnite Fortnite Toca Boca World Toca Boca World

In a fascinating look behind the curtain of one of the most beloved RPGs of all time, a former BioWare executive producer has revealed that Dragon Age: Origins was originally conceived as a standalone game, not the beginning of a sprawling franchise. This revelation, coming from veteran developer Mark Darrah in a recent interview, explains why the game’s world-building feels so rich and self-contained, but also why later entries in the series have struggled to tie up all the loose ends. It’s a candid admission that highlights the organic, and at times chaotic, nature of game development, and the profound impact that a game’s commercial success can have on its creative direction.

Speaking to YouTube creator MrMattyPlays, Darrah explained that when Dragon Age: Origins was in development, the team at BioWare didn’t have any concrete plans for a sequel. “Dragon Age: Origins was originally intended as a standalone game,” Darrah said. ” You can see this, if you play Dragon Age: Origins, knowing that it was intended to stand alone. There’s a lot of threads that are cast out that kind of had to be abandoned because there could be werewolves all over the world, there might be a civil war happening underground in Orzammar.” These were plot points meant to enrich the world of Ferelden and give the player a sense of its history, but they were never intended to be resolved in a follow-up game. This approach, while creating one of the most immersive fantasy worlds in gaming, also created a logistical nightmare for the writing team as the series expanded.

The Financial Pivot: The Birth of a Franchise

So, what changed? The answer, according to Darrah, is simple: money. The critical and commercial success of Dragon Age: Origins was so massive that it became financially illogical not to continue the series. The game sold millions of copies, became a cultural touchstone for a new generation of RPG fans, and solidified BioWare’s reputation as a top-tier developer. Electronic Arts, the game’s publisher, quickly recognized the franchise’s potential to become a long-term revenue stream, much like their other successful IPs. “It’s pretty much financial reasons more than anything,” Darrah confirmed. This decision, while a boon for fans who wanted more adventures in Thedas, forced the developers to retroactively build a franchise around a game that was not designed for one.

This led to a number of challenges, most notably the issue of maintaining continuity across games with wildly different player choices. While the game’s lore team, led by creator David Gaider, had a “master lore doc” with an overarching “uber-plot” for the world of Thedas, the specific stories and choices from Origins were not necessarily designed to be paid off in a sequel. This is why some plot lines were never revisited, and others were addressed in ways that felt a bit underwhelming in later titles. The series’ later games, Dragon Age II and Dragon Age: Inquisition, had to be much more “forward-looking” in their design, with a clearer roadmap for how their stories and player choices would impact the future of the series.

A Lost Opportunity for a Remake

Darrah’s interview also brought with it a more heartbreaking piece of news for fans of the original game. He revealed that BioWare had considered the idea of a remake or a remaster of Dragon Age: Origins but that the idea was ultimately “turned down.” This is a crushing blow for a community that has long wished for a modern version of the game, one that could be a welcome addition to the modern gaming landscape. The success of remasters like the Mass Effect Legendary Edition demonstrated the enormous potential of such a project, and many believe a remastered trilogy could have been a financial windfall for EA. However, it seems the company was not keen on the idea, an attitude that Darrah found “strange for a publicly traded company to basically be against free money.”

The new information about the game’s origins as a standalone title adds a new layer of appreciation for its incredible world-building and narrative design. It’s a testament to the talent of the original development team that they were able to create a game that felt so complete and full of potential, even without the intent of a sequel. While the later games had to make concessions to fit into a larger, interconnected narrative, the first entry in the series will always be remembered as a self-contained masterpiece. The news also provides a somber reminder of the delicate balance between creative vision and financial reality in the video game industry, a balance that can often change a project’s trajectory forever.

Scroll to Top